by Bob Bihari » Fri Nov 16, 2012 9:33 am
I was with the 1/50 when we transitioned from the 1st Cav to the 173 Airborne (I came in from the 1/12 Cav as a replacement after Tet '68), and I agree with Jim that our situation with the 173d is a definite sore spot. With the Cav we were treated (and lead) extremely well .. .we did Combat Assaults (Helicopter insertions), Mechanized Ops, as well a pure Grunt stuff (too-many klicks humping up & down the 505 & 506 Valleys and other places in our AO). They were always there to support us in the field, and they never put us in a situation where we weren't backed-up 110% .
The 173d treated us like bastard children - and besides the derision of being "Just Leg Infantry", the upper-level Officers really didn't have a clue about how to effectively use a Mechanized unit. There were some real Cluster-Fucks as a result. An Bao was a perfect example....a total screw-up from "on high"....and we paid the price.....big-time.
So yeah...it hits my buttons as well.... I NEVER wore the 173d patch - only the horse blanket. When I was wounded, they gave me a lighter in the hospital with an inscription that said "To a Wounded Trooper" & a 173d patch.
I threw it away.
A Company '68. WIA An Bao 